Fundamentals Of The Esoteric Philosophy has 9 ratings and 0 reviews. From to , Katherine Tingley sponsored a series of private studies in The Se. Fundamentals of the Esoteric Philosophy. G. de Cultural Fundamentals in Philosophy. G. de Purucker – – Covina, Calif., Theosophical University Press. Donor challenge: Your generous donation will be matched 2-to-1 right now. Your $5 becomes $15! Dear Internet Archive Supporter,. I ask only once a year.
|Published (Last):||7 August 2012|
|PDF File Size:||10.55 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.8 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Judge on several occasions and had been a close and trusted associate of Tingley for a long time. What conception can Dr.
Hardcoverpages. It is a word used in association with to another. The emphasis appears to be on the affix, para.
Fundamentals Of The Esoteric Philosophy
The Question of G. Where it seems we differ is on the question of whether Brahman i. Want to Read saving….
Suffice it to say that he simply walks over H. The problem is that the vast majority fundamenals Point Loma and Pasadena Theosophists place much more emphasis on G. There are further articles on our site relating to G. Besant he does not irrigate, he floods the field sown by H.
If anyone be in doubt as to whether Tingley was indeed more advanced and spiritually higher than HPB, we advise them to do their own independent research by finding out as much as they can about her nature and activities — from all sources, not only Point Loma and Pasadena ones — as well as reading all that they can find of her writings.
The former, Brahma or Brahman, is the impersonal, supreme and uncognizable Principle of the Universe from the essence of which all emanates, and into which all returns, which is incorporeal, immaterial, unborn, eternal, beginningless and endless. We never store sensitive information about our customers in cookies.
Jeremy Schwartz rated it it was amazing Aug 21, Refresh and try again. You will assuredly receive in time some hy this Lodge-force; for as I am the intermediary or mediator between the Great Lodge of the Masters of Compassion and Wisdom and the general membership of the T. When I was younger doctrinal points bothered me much and I philosopjy to resolve them; not to mention, get a clear intellectual grasp of Parabrahm, the One etc.
The questions answer themselves. Lists with This Book.
The Question of G. de Purucker – T H E O S O P H Y
Any member of any other Theosophical Society can philosopphy a Fellow of the T. Open Preview See a Problem? Askia Mohammed marked it as to-read Aug 09, A activation email has been sent to you. The majority of the Point Loma and Pasadena Theosophists have been thus swayed and their organisations and work have shrunk and become permanently stunted as a result.
Examples will be shown below. Dr de Purucker fails most signally to distinguish between the real tradition and his own personal opinions.
As to whether we personally consider the teachings and books of G. Subscribe to our newsletter Some error text Name. When HPB uses any Hindu terms in a different sense from how they are generally used and understood in Hindu philosophy, she usually says so and explains it.
Will Newman marked it as to-read Aug 01, For example, at loot. Fudnamentals was severely criticized and I think rightly, for presenting views as part of the Esoteric Philosophy apparently in conflict with what The Secret Doctrine teaches.
William Judge, although highly regarded and respected, is pushed into the background. Also sloka 3 of the 8th discourse: In fairness and justice to G. It cannot refer to a physical or mental object, as that would be limiting the Absolute, nor could it even convey a fundametals concept, as fundamntals would also be limiting.
No trivia or quizzes yet. This book is not yet featured on Listopia. The last work of H. Take heed and listen well! The impersonal and nameless universal Principle. David Melik added it Oct 06, Other texts is it the Hiranyagarbha Philpsophy. I understand it to be simply a vague idea. The idea is to use what is conveyed through symbolism, not by literal definitions.